[lug] Idea for a new tutorial....maybe???
jstarkey at polaris.umuc.edu
Sat Apr 8 19:50:45 MDT 2000
> i suppose my issue is primarily that i am used to a much more
> conversational quoting style (which i hope is what i use), not the
> "add four lines at the top, and just fire it off" approach.
I usually do things this way when there's more than a few issues in the
message. I thought of it as a courtesy to not make someone scroll and get
caught up in strings of '>'. Whatever works though. I think I like this
way better anyway.
> John> Is it that much bandwidth??
> well, you added about 300 characters of new content to an existing 3kB
> message. send that out to 400+ people, and you're talking a few
> megabytes. *shrug* not that much anymore, but again, i have the
> habit of assuming that anything quoted in a message is quoted there
> for a reason.
Good point. I wasn't thinking of the "forks" (hmmmm). Very good point.
> isn't that the entire *point* of the archives, to keep full copies of
> everything we send back and forth, so we *don't* have to keep on
> sending duplicates of everything?
Another good point.
> so it's not a huge deal, it's just (in my eyes) a matter of courtesy
> to other list members. *shrug*
Yea, I completely understand and agree. But you do realize that yer killin
my 8 year old internet virtual ego!!!! Thanks.
> t, awaiting the "yeah, and using non-standard capitalization is
> courteous" responses.... :)
Another good point:}
More information about the LUG