[lug] So now we're a bunch of communists, eh?
nate at natetech.com
Mon Jul 31 10:18:01 MDT 2000
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 06:49:06AM -0600, B O'Fallon wrote:
> Steve Ballmer, at Microsoft's annual financial analysts meeting in
> Seattle (the full article is here:
> "Linux is a tough competitor. There's no company led Linux, there's
> barely a Linux road map. Yet Linux sort of springs organically from the
> earth. And it had, you know, the characteristics of communism that
> people love so very, very much about it. That is, it's free."
> I have in my lifetime been called many, many things (some good, some not
> so good) but no one until now has dared called me a communist. Perhaps a
> better term for Linux users would be "anarchists." Or, we since they
> want something for free, how about "misers"?
> But communists? Never!
Libertarian (without the silly U.S. political party system's baggage)
seems more appropriate to me.
Ballmer's an ass. He's always talkin' smack, but I suppose I would too
if I were as egotistical as he and believed that my software was so
important to have that everyone on the planet NEEDED it.
Sorry... (rant-mode off now). It's Monday.
Nate Duehr <nate at natetech.com>
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the LUG