How Home Backups Should Be Done(tm) Was: [lug] Tape Drive Recommendation...
jafo at tummy.com
Mon Aug 21 23:02:44 MDT 2000
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 08:01:26PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
>It is important that your full and incrementals all fit comfortably on one
>tape. If they don't, then GET A BIGGER TAPE.
I agree with all your suggestions. The problem gets back to the idea that
tape drives just haven't kept up. One of the next couple of days I'm
planning on ordering a 60GB hard drive for well under $300.
I used to be excited about the idea of using tapes for a kind of
HSM -- I mean you could get $10 cartridges that held 2 to 4 gigabytes!
Inconcievable! Average seek time on a DDS tape drive was around
40 seconds -- I could wait 40 seconds for little-used data. That was
back when a 1 or 2GB hard drive was over a grand, and a DDS tape drive
was slightly cheaper.
Now we've got 10 times the storage for a tenth the price in hard
drives and, well, still DDS with the drives costing a grand. The
capacity has increased by 10x, but the cost hasn't gone down
a similar amount, which leaves tapes an order of magnitude less
effective than before.
So, how about: periodicly spend some time and make a couple of copies
of a base-line. A full backup with everything on it. Then run
a level 2 backup of things that changed since the base-line and
append to that additional incrementals.
I wholely agree that you should only be swapping a single tape every
week. Anything more than that and you probably won't do it.
-rw-rw-rw-: File permissions of the beast. (Chuck Phillips)
mknod /dev/beast c 6 66
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
More information about the LUG