[lug] att at home cable service
howeljs at louisville.stortek.com
Wed Oct 18 00:04:56 MDT 2000
One caveat to the whole discussion.... I live in Broomfield and neither is
available. @Home keeps promising to have it up by the end of the year
(they said this last year) and ant attemp to get DSL through any carrier
will get a message back from Quest (USWest): Insufficient facilities at
central office. No plans to expand at this time. Cancel order.
I've been fighting for 2 years to get some form of broadband for <$100/mo.
At this point Ive been using ISDN for about 6 months.
Hope you have better luck!
EDS Unix Support
Linux Slackware: The Ultimate NT Service Pack
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:36:27PM -0600, Dan Radom wrote:
> > I'm relocating to Broomfield from Kansas City, and was hoping for a little
> > info on @home service. Having read their information I'm not sure if this
> > is the right service for me. First of all I'm looking for a static IP
> > address. I suppose DHCP would be acceptable as long as the IP didn't change
> > very often. I've got 3-4 machines behind a masq'd linux box. Does att at home
> > need to know about those machine? I can block scans originating from their
> > network. I'm basically looking for some sort of highspeed access with a
> > static IP address. Any thoughts or suggestions?
> > Dan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> == Timothy Klein || And what rough beast ==
> == teece at hypermall.net || Its hour come round at last ==
> == Aufwiedersehen! || Slouches towards Bethleham to be born? ==
> == Aufwiedersehen! || The beast of Redmond, nothing more. ==
More information about the LUG