[lug] source rpm dependencies
stimits at idcomm.com
Thu Mar 15 19:46:45 MST 2001
Nate Duehr wrote:
> Yeah I was havin' my usual fun poking at RPM, but that was my original thought
> too... something's wrong with the dependencies in the SRPM file. Fix it and
> send a patch upstream to whoever created the SRPM. :-)
Unfortunately, I don't know who packaged it, nor do I have enough rpm
knowledget to patch it.
> Quoting Sean Reifschneider <jafo at tummy.com>:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:43:06PM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> > >This is where I love dpkg. "bash - provides sh".
> > >Go Debian! :-) hahaha...
> > As if RPM doesn't have that... It would seem that the SRPM that's being
> > built is broken (at least from a RedHat standpoint). Is there some sort
> > of pre-req in the .spec file that is asking for /bin/sh? What is the
> > result of "rpm -qf /bin/sh" on that machine?
> > I rebuild nearly everything from SRPM, and really haven't seen this
> > problem,
> > except when somone had the wrong pre-reqs in the .spec file. Install
> > the
> > SRPM, then look in it's spec file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
> > Sean
> > --
> > Just because something doesn't do what you planned it to do doesn't
> > mean
> > it's useless. -- T. Edison
> > Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo at tummy.com>
> > tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Nate Duehr, nate at natetech.com
> "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROM's."
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
More information about the LUG