[lug] Re: recycling code [WAS Fwd: NICHOLAS PETRELEY: "The Op en Source" ]
dholshou at ball.com
Thu Mar 22 16:04:30 MST 2001
Never said anything about time being wasted.
Only said that the width of development might be narrowed so that
the present apps can be finished.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rm at mamma.varadinet.de [SMTP:rm at mamma.varadinet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:59 PM
> To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Subject: Re: [lug] Re: recycling code [WAS Fwd: NICHOLAS PETRELEY:
> "The Op en Source" ]
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:22:56PM -0700, Holshouser, David wrote:
> > The time and effort spent on creating slightly varied copies of apps.
> > The time spent on rewritting the whole app, comes in to play on this.
> > People are spending so much time getting their own ideas to print that
> > the overall output of apps is broad but shallow. Again, we are talking
> > about the GUI, not the kernel, not the development process. I'm just
> > saying that I have 200 mail readers to choose from that are all in
> > 0.9 states. It hurts and drives [(boss)|(parents)|(kids)|(joe sixpack)]
> I like to think that the time isn't wasted since someone wrote
> code and learned something. And this is an 'early' population.
> Time _will_ weed out most of it. Maybe we should wait and talk
> in a few years ?
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
More information about the LUG