[lug] Qwest DSL and Microsoft
teece at silverklein.net
Sat Aug 4 00:46:09 MDT 2001
I would say absolutely. I doubt there will be any plans to
transition Linux, or even Unix users. I found that contract to
be a bummer.
That's a strong point about DSL, though, the ISP is seperated
from the line provider. I have Qwest DSL, but I do not have
Qwest.net. I use a company called Forethought.net. There are
several other good choices out there, too.
I would not be at all surprised if Linux machines are left out
in the cold by the conversion to MSN.
As an aside, what if a cable broadband company were to do this?
You don't get a choice of ISPs on cable, so if AT&T were to
'transition' their @Home customers to MSN for some reason (which
seems unlikely, but I didn't see the Qwest one coming either),
one might just be out of luck, wouldn't they?
On Friday 03 August 2001 11:20 am, Paul Hardiman wrote:
> Just read on slash dot another article about Qwest using MSN
> for service providers. The Q&A doesn't have a lot of useful
> info for Linux shops.
> We use a dedicated ip address and a Linux firewall. The bummer
> is that it took US West several weeks to get me fully
> configured on their end - very painful. I would hate to go
> through this again.
> The big question: should I be shopping for a new isp?
== Timothy Klein || teece at silverklein.net ==
== ---------------------------------------- ==
== "Hello, World" 17 Errors, 31 Warnings... ==
More information about the LUG