[lug] Qwest DSL and Microsoft
feenix at ticnet.com
Fri Aug 3 23:06:40 MDT 2001
Just as an FYI, I use ATT @ home. So far no problems, but I can't seems
to figure out DHCP (or pump). What I did, was go into M$98 and get the
ip adress. I hardcoded linux for the ip. It has work for about 2 mos
now. I wonder how long I'll be able to keep the ip...
Tim Klein wrote:
> I would say absolutely. I doubt there will be any plans to
> transition Linux, or even Unix users. I found that contract to
> be a bummer.
> That's a strong point about DSL, though, the ISP is seperated
> from the line provider. I have Qwest DSL, but I do not have
> Qwest.net. I use a company called Forethought.net. There are
> several other good choices out there, too.
> I would not be at all surprised if Linux machines are left out
> in the cold by the conversion to MSN.
> As an aside, what if a cable broadband company were to do this?
> You don't get a choice of ISPs on cable, so if AT&T were to
> 'transition' their @Home customers to MSN for some reason (which
> seems unlikely, but I didn't see the Qwest one coming either),
> one might just be out of luck, wouldn't they?
> On Friday 03 August 2001 11:20 am, Paul Hardiman wrote:
> > Just read on slash dot another article about Qwest using MSN
> > for service providers. The Q&A doesn't have a lot of useful
> > info for Linux shops.
> > We use a dedicated ip address and a Linux firewall. The bummer
> > is that it took US West several weeks to get me fully
> > configured on their end - very painful. I would hate to go
> > through this again.
> > The big question: should I be shopping for a new isp?
> == Timothy Klein || teece at silverklein.net ==
> == ---------------------------------------- ==
> == "Hello, World" 17 Errors, 31 Warnings... ==
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
More information about the LUG