Social Contracts: was Re: [lug] Attempted hack from 18.104.22.168
Scott A. Herod
herod at interact-tv.com
Mon Apr 22 09:37:32 MDT 2002
Speaking of social contracts, did anyone see the business section
of the Camera on Saturday. I'm I wrong to become angry about the
publication of a map with stick-pins locating open wireless networks.
( No, mine is not one of them. ) I acknowledge the necessity of
making security vulnerabilities well known, but that map seems to
be the ethical equivalent of a lock-smith checking front doors in a
neighborhood and printing a map of people that don't lock theirs.
At what point do people alerting others to security problems go too
Paul Bille wrote:
> > I get stuff like this all day long . . .
> Thanks Daniel.
> I guess I have too much time on my hands. Anyone know where I can find some
> work to occupy my time and fill out my check book?
> In the mean while, it's not a futile effort. I received a note from
> abuse at jaring.my confirming they had identified the source and advised the
> network administrator to take action.
> There may be value in creating a "Wall of Shame"; a database of known
> abusers. If we compile a list of sources for these kinds of attacks, maybe
> we can discourage them. Initially accumulating the IPs for attacks would
> allow us to identify ISPs with lax security. Ultimately it would be
> desirable to tie attacks directly to authors by name. Reputation, good or
> bad is a social contract that holds people accountable for their actions.
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
More information about the LUG