[lug] Is anon ftp upload really bad?
RRiggs at doubleclick.net
Wed Apr 24 10:59:38 MDT 2002
As long as the anonymously uploaded files are not readable and visible to
anonymous users, it is OK. Otherwise, the Warez community will soon be using
the server to distribute their goods.
From: Peter Hutnick [mailto:peter-lists at hutnick.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:56 AM
To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us; John Hernandez
Subject: Re: [lug] Is anon ftp upload really bad?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 10:42 am, John Hernandez wrote:
> But the real reason for my reply is to urge you to seek an alternative
> to the anonymous ftp upload situation you have in place. It's
> generally accepted to be a bad thing.
Can you give any rational reason for this?
I ran a server like this for well over a year with no ill effects.
/"\ ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
X Get my PGP key at http://hutnick.com/pgp
/ \ 6128 5651 6F23 EC17 6EBD 737D 960A 20E6 76CA 8A59
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
More information about the LUG