[lug] Cheap centralized storage
James_Harris at maxtor.com
Mon Nov 4 11:32:19 MST 2002
I have done exactly 0 searching on this, but, you might want to look into a
solution like Quantum's SNAP servers. I'd pimp out Maxtor's MaxAttach, but
that's a dead line, so Quantum's the next best thing. If they have anything
to compete with the MaxAttach 6000 (over 3TB capacity) you might be able to
get a very serious solution for cheaper than SCSI. Last I heard, the SNAPs
were Linux powered.
From: Orion Poplawski [mailto:orion at colorado-research.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:26
To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
Subject: [lug] Cheap centralized storage
I'm looking for suggestions for inexpensive centralized disk storage
solutions. I'm working for a scientific research company that uses a fair
amount of disk space, though not huge by some measures. About 3.5 TB is in
place right now, distributed among many machines and NFS automounted on
demand. This situation is tolerable, and it allows one to distribute cheap
IDE disks in various machines.
If possible though, I'd like to consider moving to a more centralized
solution which might provide easier management and tape backup. However, it
seems that most mid- to large- scale SCSI systems are quite expensive. And
IDE seems limited in the amount of disks supported in a single machine, at
least until serial-ATA is in production.
Any thoughts? Are there server motherboards out there with "lots" of IDE
interfaces? Other cheap drive interfaces (FW? USB 2.0?) to look at?
Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
More information about the LUG