[lug] imap performance
hugh at math.byu.edu
Sat Feb 8 10:44:04 MST 2003
Quoting Nate Duehr <nate at natetech.com>:
> How much RAM is in the mail server?
Only 256MB and it was swapping 30MB. So I will look at getting more for it.
> I found that even on a lightly loaded UW-IMAP machine, adding physical RAM
> made a world of difference in the responsiveness of the server. I never
> into the code to see if it's pulling a lot of things into RAM when there
> a lot of mail files, and this particular box doesn't see many simultaneous
> users, but all the users have a lot of mail sorted and stored on it in
> different "folders".
> Also, are you running imap through inetd/xinetd or as a direct server
> listening on a port? inetd/xinetd could slow down the process
Yup, also a good point. I'll look at that.
> On this lightly loaded server, I decided I still wanted some of the
> of xinetd in front of UW, so I left it there, but I did find that certain
> clients (Outlook Express in particular) if a user had a LOT of mail folders
> could make more connections per minute than inetd would allow to the IMAP
> daemon... and had to raise the limits in the configuration.
I have managed to outlaw Outlook for the most part at the company. So that's
not as much of an issue.
More information about the LUG