[lug] Best block size?
jaa at cc.jyu.fi
Mon Sep 15 12:25:55 MDT 2003
On 2003-09-15 11:53-0600, Gary Hodges wrote:
> The Matt wrote:
> > ReiserFS doesn't really use blocks but
> > trees. It can often be 10x faster than ext3 on small files. On large
> > files (e.g., ISOs) it's usually comparable to ext3 (no big advantage).
> > But, if doesn't work well with NFS or software RAID. So, if that's what
> > you'll be using, ReiserFS won't work.
> I was going to format it ext3. I've never really considered using a
> filesystem other than ext2 or ext3.
You might also like to take look of ext3+htree, however, I am not sure what is
the status of htree at the moment.
More information about the LUG