# [lug] OT LaTeX question

Wed Jan 14 14:21:17 MST 2004

```On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 14:14, rm at fabula.de wrote:
>
> > *Old* versions of fancybox have done this
> > before according to a web search:
> >
> > % Problem FancyBox 1.0 <-> LaTeX 2e with the \fancyput macro
> > % The following line solve several problems in `fancybox' macros,
> > % If you really need the TOC, try to comment next line and to recompile.
> > \newcount\c at tocdepth
>
> And bingo! Yes, i do use fancybox in one of my macros. Changing the
> above mentioned line does solve the problem!
>

Hmm...yeah, you should probably upgrade fancybox, then.  I know FC1
ships with a 2000 version (probably the newest) and I think it was
supposed to have been fixed.

Matt
--
I am a theoretical chemist.  Fear me!