[lug] Mozilla mail client misses messages?
nate at natetech.com
Wed Jan 21 07:06:20 MST 2004
On Monday, Jan 19, 2004, at 16:34 America/Denver, Zan Lynx wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:27, Nate Duehr wrote:
>> Oh well... Mozilla/Netscape mailers are much more intelligent about
>> but they also take forever and a day to load... and a huge memory
>> footprint compared to Kmail. :-) Catch-22.
>> And then of course, there's always mutt when you really want to go
> You're just not using the fast enough hard drives.
> Put a SCSI Seagate 15k.3 in your workstation and load Mozilla. gkrellm
> reports 15 MB/s read for 1 or 2 seconds and Fwoop, there it is!
Heh heh heh... touche'. Good idea. If you'll do the honors of
convincing my boss that I'm due for my first raise after a 30% pay-cut
over three years, I'll get right on that!
(No offense to those on the list who are job-hunting or still
job-hunting. At least the economy is showing slows signs of
improvement... even my little medium-sized employer showed $0.05 EPS
over last quarter's $0.01. Yay. Buying RHEL is still out of the
question, though. GRIN...)
Nate Duehr, nate at natetech.com
More information about the LUG