Inaccurate subject: Re: [lug] GROKLAW- SCO Drops Linux Claims
crawford.rainwater at linux-etc.net
Wed Feb 11 09:35:59 MST 2004
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 15:37, Nate Duehr wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Chris Riddoch wrote:
> > In the future, Crawford, could you try to check the accuracy of things
> > you forward, and provide a little more than just a link? The briefest
> > summaries will almost always be deceptively inaccurate.
> Heh, even the "professional journalists" don't seem to do that much
> these days.
> Crawford has a future in headline writing! ;-)
> Seriously though, thanks for posting the story -- I have a friend who's
> a Groklaw junkie, but I can't afford to spend as much time there as he
> does. The heads up (even if a little optimistic) was appreciated!
> It's entertaining to watch SCO start to squirm.
Actually, as noted Chris, it is a forward from the Atlanta LUG (ALE). I
was in the process of reading and breaking out my legalese-English
translation matrix dictionary before I got interrupted and had to side
bench it. Otherwise I would have been able to give a better summary of
the whole scoop there, which if anyone has read through "all" of it,
there is quite a bit.
My apologies on the title not being completely accurate for the FW'ing.
More information about the LUG