Inaccurate subject: Re: [lug] GROKLAW- SCO Drops Linux Claims
joem at scare.org
Wed Feb 11 10:34:08 MST 2004
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:35:59AM -0700, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 15:37, Nate Duehr wrote:
> > On Feb 10, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Chris Riddoch wrote:
> > > In the future, Crawford, could you try to check the accuracy of things
> > > you forward, and provide a little more than just a link? The briefest
> > > summaries will almost always be deceptively inaccurate.
Then why include them? I don't need a redacted summary.. and I notice
you didn't update the inaccuracies in your reply. :P
> > Heh, even the "professional journalists" don't seem to do that much
> > these days.
> > Crawford has a future in headline writing! ;-)
> > Seriously though, thanks for posting the story -- I have a friend who's
> > a Groklaw junkie, but I can't afford to spend as much time there as he
> > does. The heads up (even if a little optimistic) was appreciated!
> > It's entertaining to watch SCO start to squirm.
> Actually, as noted Chris, it is a forward from the Atlanta LUG (ALE). I
> was in the process of reading and breaking out my legalese-English
> translation matrix dictionary before I got interrupted and had to side
> bench it. Otherwise I would have been able to give a better summary of
> the whole scoop there, which if anyone has read through "all" of it,
> there is quite a bit.
> My apologies on the title not being completely accurate for the FW'ing.
> --- Crawford
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
More information about the LUG