[lug] Re: CVS and Subversion
lists at danielwebb.us
Fri Oct 27 17:57:11 MDT 2006
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:46:22AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> SVN is absolutely rock solid.
That's been my experience too, especially since version 1.0 (and it was really
good even before that).
As to the Perl bindings being ugly: how could anything in Perl *not* be ugly?
Subversion is really nice. It may be limited compared to newer ways of doing
things, but if you just want a CVS that works right, you want Subversion. CVS
was/is a disaster in my opinion, but I've never had any complaints using
More information about the LUG