[lug] Development & reporting tool choices
ville.kallioniemi at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 06:48:32 MST 2009
On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:47 PM, David L. Anselmi wrote:
> Ville Kallioniemi wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
>>> 3) Any thoughts on the methods to generate XML via C ?
>> libxml is pretty good:
>> Although doing xml in C/C++ is a PITA compared to e.g. python or
> How does libxml compare to xerces?
Xerces is for C++ and Java. From what I understand, libxml supports
more advanced features, although I've never needed anything fancier
than parsing and creation. I've mostly used xerces c++, so I was
happily surprised by the lightness of libxml.
Also, my impression is that libxml is more actively developed and more
widely used (e.g. Apple, gnome).
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
More information about the LUG