[lug] OT: Colocation Providers
georges at mhsoftware.com
Mon Aug 17 18:09:09 MDT 2009
I hate dealing with Virtual servers. Every now and again, I have to install
our software on a machine running in a virtual server. It's just a
nightmare. Their Linux version is 5 years old, the JVM is the GNU one, which
is a joke; the RAM situation is squirrelly. Support is useless. They use
CPANEL, which is the nightmare of the universe. Nobody really understands
how CPANEL works so I have to re-figure it out each time.
I would much rather just do my own server than have to deal with the
additional complications of virtual servers.
MH Software, Inc.
Voice: 303 438 9585
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces at lug.boulder.co.us [mailto:lug-
> bounces at lug.boulder.co.us] On Behalf Of Sean Reifschneider
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:09 PM
> To: Boulder (Colorado) Linux Users Group -- General Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [lug] OT: Colocation Providers
> On 08/17/2009 04:17 PM, George Sexton wrote:
> > This outage showed me that I really need to have my web server at a
> > different facility than my main application service servers. This is
> so I
> Does co-locating a box for that really make sense? Seems like web
> plus e-mail would easily fit on a virtual system, if not
> You realize that you can have your own domain e-mail handled by Google,
> Yahoo, etc?
> Just a thought.
More information about the LUG