[lug] named pipe missunderstanding

Jason Davis jdavis at openactive.org
Tue Feb 1 15:29:15 MST 2011

Its real runnabel code.

I use mkfifo
I have plenty of ram, no swapping.


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Davide Del Vento
<davide.del.vento at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  I think I have a missunderstanding about named pipes. Im using them
>> for IPC and Im losing data.
>> Here is the code I used:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4867780/linux-named-pipes-losing-data
>> Any ideas why I could be losing data?
> I don't know groovy, but considering it pseudocode I don't see any
> obvious problem.
> Just a couple of questions:
> 1) do you create the named pipe with mkfifo or within groovy? I'd try
> the former if you aren't already.
> 2) are you hitting the available memory size on your system and/or
> starting to fill the swap?
> You might answer with an update on stackoverflow, if you so prefer.
> Best,
> Dav
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety

More information about the LUG mailing list